It gave an impression of sieving the text – which is more or less what editing is all about.
And it was legible and had a sense of fullness to it. Although it might have been better if it were a passage from someone’s rough draft getting progressively cleaned up at each size reduction.
I found the last one very chaotic, as though it was the opposite of well-presented. This one looks orderly. I like K M Idamari’s idea of something improving, though your title is “The Well etc” rather than “Preparing the Well etc, suggesting a finished product rather than a process
I feel that the previous version of the cover art (The cascade of letters) was better than this one. The text looks good though.
What did you like about the cascade of letters, K M Idamari?
Oh, note to self: line break should go before “make” in the subtitle.
It gave an impression of sieving the text – which is more or less what editing is all about.
And it was legible and had a sense of fullness to it. Although it might have been better if it were a passage from someone’s rough draft getting progressively cleaned up at each size reduction.
I found the last one very chaotic, as though it was the opposite of well-presented. This one looks orderly. I like K M Idamari’s idea of something improving, though your title is “The Well etc” rather than “Preparing the Well etc, suggesting a finished product rather than a process