Monthly Archives: March 2017

Mar 30

One of the things I take from this: you know how supervillains always have these huge bases and elaborate machinery,…

Posted on by

One of the things I take from this: you know how supervillains always have these huge bases and elaborate machinery, but there’s no sign of anyone who works on making them – just one toadying minion and a few incompetent guards? Well, we’re getting closer to having that old trope become a bit more realistic.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

These 6 Trends Are Retooling Manufacturing as We Know It http://bit.ly/2nfwk2g

Mar 30

“Everyone should read this and that says a lot because I’m not a fan of male writers but the female characters are…

Posted on by

“Everyone should read this and that says a lot because I’m not a fan of male writers but the female characters are so well written and they aren’t the wimpy kind either than need saving. In fact I reckon if anyone needs saving it would be Sparx first.”

Yeah, pretty much what I was going for.

Also:

“I’m a big fan of stories that represent who we are. I hadn’t realised how important it was to also have stories set in places familiar to us as well.”

Yep.

https://www.nixwhittaker.com/single-post/2017/03/30/Review-Auckland-Allies-by-Mike-Reeves-McMillan
Mar 30

A more pessimistic vision of the future than I usually share.

Posted on by

A more pessimistic vision of the future than I usually share. I think unduly so (though they do acknowledge that some are optimistic). There are definitely big challenges ahead, though, and few governments are prepared for them; many haven’t caught up with the technology that exists today, let alone thought about what’s on the near horizon.

Originally shared by Winchell Chung

Just look at all those robots

https://theoutline.com/post/1316/fourth-industrial-revolution-developing-economies

Mar 28

This is not the same as GM crops (introducing DNA from another organism); it’s editing the existing organism’s DNA…

Posted on by

This is not the same as GM crops (introducing DNA from another organism); it’s editing the existing organism’s DNA as a faster version of selective breeding.

It’s still not fast, though, partly because the genetics of crops are not well understood yet.

And, of course (something the article doesn’t address), the big problem with genetically manipulated crops isn’t that they’re somehow “dangerous”; it’s that they’re owned by the large corporates that develop them, who use their monopoly power and leverage for their own benefit, not that of the farmers or consumers (or the environment).

Also not addressed: a large part of the problem with the food supply is, and has been for decades, not the amount of food that can be produced worldwide, but the logistics of distributing it to where it’s needed. And political barriers and corruption are a big part of that.

That’s without even getting into the question of food waste.

(Sorry, food and nutrition are interests of mine, and something I’ve studied at a university level; they’re complicated, and a lot of the problems are people problems, not technology problems.)

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

How to Feed 9.7 Billion People? CRISPR Gene Editing For Crops http://bit.ly/2nfpxFL

Mar 28

Iron Man is at it again.

Posted on by

Iron Man is at it again.

Originally shared by Larry Panozzo

Can’t wait until this is created. But I’m pretty sure that a prerequisite to this is a much better understanding of the brain than we have now. Read/write capability is a long way off, but it’s exciting.

Preliminarily, the brain ‘lights up’ on MRI scans in very specific ways depending on the thought, so even if Neuralink creates a top-notch BMI (brain-machine interface) then it will create a explosion in the tech world, something Musk would love to do.

http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/27/15077864/elon-musk-neuralink-brain-computer-interface-ai-cyborgs