Mar 11

I’ve heard that, though tractors have been effectively self-driving for a while now, farmers still want to be in the…

I’ve heard that, though tractors have been effectively self-driving for a while now, farmers still want to be in the cab because they enjoy being involved in the process. I suppose big agribusinesses don’t care about that, though.

Originally shared by Wayne Radinsky

“The first fully autonomous ground vehicles hitting the market aren’t cars or delivery trucks — they’re ­robo­-farmhands. The Dot Power Platform is a prime example of an explosion in advanced agricultural technology, which Goldman Sachs predicts will raise crop yields 70 percent by 2050. But Dot isn’t just a tractor that can drive without a human for backup. It’s the Transformer of ag-bots, capable of performing 100-plus jobs, from hay baler and seeder to rock picker and manure spreader, via an ­arsenal of tool modules. And though the hulking machine can carry 40,000 pounds, it navigates fields with balletic precision.”

That’s pretty breathless. Let’s see if it can live up to that. I think it may need humans in the loop.

https://www.wired.com/story/dot-power-autonomous-farming/

Mar 11

This is why Bill Gates and others have proposed a “robot tax,” and why I think it’s a good idea.

This is why Bill Gates and others have proposed a “robot tax,” and why I think it’s a good idea.

Originally shared by Cyndi S. Jameson

“The authors find some good news: automation doesn’t reduce the number of jobs available—if anything, it creates them. Although some industries have lost jobs due to automation, the productivity spillovers accruing to customer and supplier industries (what the authors call “the Costco effect”) and to overall consumer spending (what they call the “Walmart effect”) more than offset the direct losses to specific industries. The net effect is a slight increase in employment, cumulating to some 6 percent over the 1970-2007 period.

But here’s the catch: While automation has created jobs, enhanced the size of the economic pie, and increased total worker earnings, it has not raised the share of national income allocated to wages as rapidly as it has raised productivity. In short, the part of the economic pie that belongs to worker earnings has shrunk. This finding holds whether automation is measured by productivity gains, by industry-level patenting flows, or by adoption of industrial robotics. In net, the effect of automation on the share of national income allocated to wages is negative because industry-level loses are not fully offset by either “Costco” or “Walmart” effects.”

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2018/03/08/robots-arent-taking-the-jobs-just-the-paychecks-and-other-new-findings-in-economics/
Mar 11

This is a slightly different material from the “superwood” I featured a while back.

This is a slightly different material from the “superwood” I featured a while back.

Originally shared by Gideon Rosenblatt

I’m really excited about this. Costing as little as $7.44 per square meter, this new nanoscale material is also biodegradable under the right conditions. It’s also super strong (a strength-to-weight ratio that’s about eight times that of steel) and heat-insulating. This is a material to keep an eye on. It could radically alter the construction industry – and probably has a lot of other applications that we can’t yet see.

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-nanowood-20180309-story.html

Mar 10

I was thinking this morning about how New Zealanders just know, by linguistic osmosis, that certain geographical…

I was thinking this morning about how New Zealanders just know, by linguistic osmosis, that certain geographical areas of the country get a “the” in front of them and others don’t.

For example, it’s always “the North Island” and “the South Island”. If I ever see anyone refer to “North Island” with reference to New Zealand, I know they’re not from around here. But the third-largest island is “Stewart Island”. No “the”.

Then, regional names: it’s Northland, Southland, Auckland, Wellington, Canterbury, Otago, Poverty Bay, Taranaki; but the Waikato, the Coromandel, the Bay of Plenty, the King Country, the Mackenzie Country, the Maniototo, and the Wairarapa. (The) Hawkes Bay can go either way. As far as I can work out, there is no rule operating by which you can tell whether to use a “the” or not, but any geographically aware New Zealander will know which is which, and use the right version without thinking.

This is the kind of thing that a local just knows, but you won’t usually see written down anywhere for non-locals. (You won’t usually, maybe won’t ever, see the above distinctions made on maps, for example.) So, if you’re setting a story outside your own locality and culture, it pays to check with someone who knows that place and culture as an insider.

Mar 10

This is a bit breathless and optimistic, and not thought all the way through. For example:

This is a bit breathless and optimistic, and not thought all the way through. For example:

“In this future world of AI-enabled shopping, one of the most disruptive implications is that advertising is now dead.”

Uh, no. If AI is buying stuff for you because it knows your preferences, how do you develop those preferences? By looking at your friends’ preferences (and the preferences of other people you admire and trust, like celebrities), certainly, but advertising in one form or another is ultimately going to play some role.

Leaving aside the flaws, though, this is an interesting consideration of upcoming possible changes to retail.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

Your Shopping Experience Is on the Verge of a Major Transformation. Here’s Why. http://suhub.co/2oXoRHZ

Mar 09

Yes. This. Always assume that what the other person has to say is worth listening to.

Yes. This. Always assume that what the other person has to say is worth listening to.

Originally shared by Dave Higgins

When I checked G+ this morning, I saw that Kiki Jewell had commented on a mutual acquaintance’s post that:

“It’d be nice to see a posting of something men can proactively do that’s happy and positive, and results in a situation that makes us all sexually comfortable. Where men take responsibility and shoulder some of the burden of healthy sexual relationship for both.”

Today seems like the ideal day to give that a try. Not because it’s #InternationalWomensDay, but because it’s always an ideal day to do something worthwhile. So, here goes.

Most proactive thing I can think of that men can do? Be someone who is open to discussion.

Not in the narrow in-the-middle-of-sex sense of saying you’d like to try something now, letting them raise a concern, then trying to convince them to do it, but as close to all the time as you can manage.

Anyone, anywhere, any situation, be open to discussion. Live the belief that other people’s opinions are worthy of consideration. Evangelise for reason having value.

Really. Properly. Not just when it will get you something, but even – especially – when it might not.

Wondering what you get out of it? Time for a story.

Many years ago, a friend of a friend had a bouquet of roses left on her doorstep without a note. She had my friend check whether they were from me. They weren’t. When my friend relayed back that they weren’t, she commented that it was a shame: she wasn’t interested in me, but if they’d been from me rather than one of the other possibilities, it wouldn’t have been creepy. Which was a pleasing thing to hear when the message was passed to me.

Not sharing this to suggest I’m perfect. Rather, to point out that striving to respect everyone’s agency even when it didn’t serve me, made me not creepy.

Which is a good thing in itself.

And means that there’s no need to be constantly on edge that the slightest innocent thing might be misinterpreted.

What should men do that’s proactive? Instead of focusing on active consent when you think you’re about to have sex, be a person who lives the consensual nature of society.

Mar 08

What are the chances of education systems being thoroughly, and effectively, revamped in response to increasing…

What are the chances of education systems being thoroughly, and effectively, revamped in response to increasing automation?

It would be a wonderful thing if it could happen in the way this article sets out, but I have to confess to some cynicism about whether it can.

Laura Gibbs will probably find this interesting.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

How We Can ‘Robot-Proof’ Education to Better Adapt to Automation http://suhub.co/2Db79Fg

Mar 06

The effect of AI (like any tech) has a lot to do with who is using it – meaning that there will be malicious and…

The effect of AI (like any tech) has a lot to do with who is using it – meaning that there will be malicious and dangerous uses as well as benign ones, which we’ll have to defend against somehow.

In other words, business as usual, but with a new set of possibilities to think about.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

New Malicious AI Report Outlines Biggest Threats of the Next 5 Years http://suhub.co/2tiDWJ1

Mar 05

While the headline is the equivalent of “guinea pigs and goldfish are battling it out for the future of being pets”,…

While the headline is the equivalent of “guinea pigs and goldfish are battling it out for the future of being pets”, the article does provide a summary of the state of the play and the obstacles to adoption of both kinds of futuristic transport.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

Hyperloop and Flying Cars Are Battling It Out for the Future of Transportation http://suhub.co/2FWb0Jh

http://suhub.co/2FV6dYL

Mar 04

The paradox of Hollywood is that, while loudly championing liberal values, it has provided a toxic working…

The paradox of Hollywood is that, while loudly championing liberal values, it has provided a toxic working environment for women and minorities and produced a century of media that reinforces stereotypes and abusive power structures.

Can it change?

Originally shared by Shannon Turlington

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/03/opinion/sunday/we-got-rid-of-some-bad-men-now-lets-get-rid-of-bad-movies.html