Aug 25

So this is the story of Monty’s hauls.

So this is the story of Monty’s hauls.

Back in a rural part of the southern US somewheres, there was a feller name of Andrew Montgomery, but everyone just called him Monty. His hobby was hauling things.

See, Monty had built himself what he called, for reasons mysterious, his “Yuma hauler”. What Yuma had to do with it, nobody could figure, but Monty’s boast was that this contraption could haul anything that had two ends. And if it only had one end, why, that Yuma hauler could make it have two ends.

It was basically an oversized motor, a reinforced chassis, some caterpillar treads, and a set of low gears. And any time anyone in the county wanted something hauled, whether it was a car out of a ditch or a stump out of a bog, they called Monty. He’d bring the Yuma hauler and get the job done, and he never even charged for it; did it for the sheer love of the haul. But usually folks would talk him into accepting some food or beer or like that.

Now, there were two fellers round about that weren’t so happy about Monty and his Yuma hauler: Alexander and Richard Shaw, or Sandy and Rocky, to their friends. See, the Shaw brothers had the towing contract with the American Automobile Association for that county, and thanks to Monty, the only business they got in that way was folks passing through what didn’t know about Monty’s hauler. And not a lot of folks passed through. The Shaws had a garage as well, but they always resented that they had to keep a tow truck running and barely made enough to cover its upkeep, year to year.

Well, one day, seems that Bob Veritt’s big old eighteen-wheeler broke down just off of the highway, and needed a tow. Bob and his wife Maureen ran a small independent trucking company, or, to be more accurate, Maureen ran the trucking company, and also Bob. It was a standing joke in the county that if you asked Bob for his opinion, he’d have to call up Maureen to find out what it was. People round and about, out of their hearing, used to refer to the Veritts as “the Maureens”.

Be that as it may, on this occasion when the truck broke down, Bob couldn’t get a hold of Maureen to ask her what he should do – her phone was out of charge, or some such – so he did what everyone in the county did when something needed hauling. He called up Monty.

So soon enough, here comes Monty on top of his Yuma hauler, grinning all over his face in anticipation of a good haul. He fairly loved to haul things.

He and Bob hitch up the tow cable, only the tow point on the old truck has broken off, so Bob crawls under and attaches it to whatever he can find. He’s got a full load of bagged cement in the tractor and trailer, and he says to Monty, “You reckon that thing of your’n can haul all of this? Should I maybe unhook the trailer?” His hand creeps to his phone, like he wants to call Maureen and ask her.

Well, that was like a challenge to Monty. “‘Course she can!” he says. “My Yuma hauler can haul anything that’s got two ends.”

He starts it up, and puts it into gear.

The cable comes up taut, twang, and commences to vibrate.

The truck ain’t moving.

Monty narrows his eyes and changes to a lower gear, then feeds the Yuma more diesel.

The cable creaks.

Then, all at once, with a terrible tearing sound, the whole front of Bob’s truck, where the engine is, parts company with the cab and flies into the air, narrowly missing Bob. It bounces off the road, and Monty only saves himself by leaping off the Yuma’s seat into the ditch. It comes down on the seat, thud, and the Yuma’s engine coughs into silence.

Bob and Monty stand there looking at the smoking ruins of their respective vehicles for a few stunned seconds. Then Bob says in a small voice, “I guess I better call Maureen.”

And that is the story of how the Maureens went from the hauls of Monty’s Yuma to the Shaws of Triple A.

Aug 24

Editors, take note.

Editors, take note.

I remember a particular amateur editor who didn’t know English language nearly as well as she thought she did. I had to fight her in order to retain my style and voice in a short story I submitted to an anthology (and swore never again to participate in any project she was a part of).

Like V.S. Naipaul, I studied English language at university, so I was able to explain why some of her edits were incorrect; but a lot of it came down to “this is in my voice; don’t edit it so that it’s in yours”.

I have worked with a lot of editors, and the true professionals help me to bring the best out of my writing. They only suggest changes when things are unclear, misleading, or incorrect. I was an editor myself at one time, and it’s one of those professions in which, if you do your job well, nobody notices.

Originally shared by Alexander M Zoltai

V.S. Naipaul Writes an Enraged Letter to His Publisher After a Copy-Editor Revises His Book, A Turn in the South

http://www.openculture.com/2018/08/v-s-naipaul-writes-enraged-letter-publisher-copy-editor-revises-book-turn-south.html
Aug 21

“Because the same society that taught some people they were heroes, saviors .

Originally shared by Daniel Swensen

“Because the same society that taught some people they were heroes, saviors … taught me I existed only in the background of their stories… waiting for them to rescue me. And for a long time, I believed them.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/movies/kelly-marie-tran.html#click=https://t.co/AhqpES4EEf

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/movies/kelly-marie-tran.html#click=https://t.co/AhqpES4EEf
Aug 21

“Because the same society that taught some people they were heroes, saviors

Originally shared by Daniel Swensen

“Because the same society that taught some people they were heroes, saviors … taught me I existed only in the background of their stories… waiting for them to rescue me. And for a long time, I believed them.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/movies/kelly-marie-tran.html#click=https://t.co/AhqpES4EEf

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/movies/kelly-marie-tran.html#click=https://t.co/AhqpES4EEf

Aug 18

While I feel this article creates alarm without setting out a clear path forward, it does make some valid points.

While I feel this article creates alarm without setting out a clear path forward, it does make some valid points. I was born in the 1960s and educated in the 1980s, and I do a job that didn’t exist in either of those decades. In my early 50s, I find myself needing to learn new skills, remain calm in the midst of constant change, hold uncertainty lightly, and define who I am again.

How much more will a child born today, or being educated now, need those skills and abilities? And how badly is today’s education system preparing them for the world of 2050? (No disrespect to teachers, who do an almost impossible job, often with great dedication and inadequate resources; it’s the system that is poorly designed.)

The future is not only stranger than we imagine, it’s stranger than we can imagine.

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/yuval-noah-harari-extract-21-lessons-for-the-21st-century

Aug 17

We need more software engineers like this.

We need more software engineers like this.

Originally shared by Self-Rescuing Princess Society

Today’s the birthday of Margaret Hamilton.

What I find fascinating about her work was the fact that she was building the field of computer software engineering as she went along. The brilliance of her work wasn’t so much that she build a system to help the astronauts reach the moon, but that she built it to basically save them from their own mistakes.

When NASA began its quest to send the first humans to the moon, there was immense pressure to make certain that whomever went up into space also came back down safely. Too much was riding on the success of the moon landing and any mistake could have dire consequences for the astronauts. It would be devastating to the space program if something terrible happened with millions of people around the world sitting on the edge of their seats watching each space launch and landing.

Astronauts are highly trained, intelligent people, selected for their ability to function under extreme pressure. But even astronauts make mistakes, push the wrong button, switch the wrong knob. How do you reconcile the absolute need for “no room for error” with the fact that “to err is human?”

Margaret Hamilton figured out a way.

Read more about her on the SRPS blog: https://selfrescuingprincesssociety.blogspot.com/2017/08/todays-birthday-of-computer-science.html