Dec 22

We are in an energy transformation moment, and it looks unstoppable. Fortunately.

We are in an energy transformation moment, and it looks unstoppable. Fortunately.

Originally shared by Greg Batmarx

The cost of solar panels is dropping exponentially, and solar power is now 80% cheaper than it was in 2010. A new startup plans to make it even more of a threat to fossil fuels, while also making panels much more efficient.

Using a particle accelerator, a machine that speeds up sub-atomic particles to nearly the speed of light, Rayton Solar slices up ultra-precise pieces of silicon, the key material used to make most solar panels. In typical manufacturing, a clunky cutting process wastes much of the material. When making a 200 micron-thick wafer of silicon, another 200 microns of the material ends up as sawdust.

The new patented process eliminates that waste.

Once you have a certain energy level of the particle and you shoot it at a block of silicon, it will penetrate at a certain depth into that silicon says Andrew Yakub Rayton Solar’s 29-year-old CEO. That’s how we do our cutting at such a precise depth.

By preserving the material, Rayton is able to use higher-quality silicon, something that wasn’t economic for companies to do in the past.

The new panels are 25% more efficient. That leads to a reduction in other costs, less land is needed, and less other equipment. And the panels themselves are also 60% cheaper to manufacture.

That dramatic drop in cost could help the solar industry grow much faster than it already is. Rayton has proven the process in the lab, and is currently running an equity crowdfunding campaign to build a pilot manufacturing line (it plans to do this in the U.S.; the low cost of the new process makes it economic to build here). Then it plans to quickly scale.

Solar has hit the threshold where it’s just about become the cheapest source of energy says Yakub. It’s just about to cross that threshold. And with a slight technological improvement like this, it will push it over that limit and allow for the widesacle adoption worldwide of solar. It would be the economic solution anywhere you are. We see this happening with or without Rayton’s technology. But our technology will speed it up significantly.

It’s something that will happen, he says, whether or not the next administration supports renewable energy.

In regards to Trump, I see him not having an effect on the solar industry he says. Because the economics are there. If the economics are there, the natural market forces will take control. I don’t see it as something that the government can have much control of.

https://www.fastcoexist.com/3066337/this-startup-uses-a-particle-accelerator-to-make-solar-panels-much-much-cheaper

Dec 20

Like all technologies, this has a wide range of possibilities, from astonishing to terrifying.

Like all technologies, this has a wide range of possibilities, from astonishing to terrifying. And like all technologies, it will be used for good and ill, competently and incompetently.

A big part of what the future will look like depends on who is in control, which is, to me, the more important question.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

We’re moving from biological to digital evolution, which means we control how we evolve

http://suhub.co/2i5Z9iL

Dec 19

I recently learned that Cosmopolitan started out as a “serious” magazine that published some speculative fiction.

I recently learned that Cosmopolitan started out as a “serious” magazine that published some speculative fiction. It may yet loop back around, as women’s magazines defy the stereotype that you can either be interested in politics or interested in makeup, but not both.

Originally shared by Jennifer Ouellette

“Women’s publications have been offering substantive, worthwhile political takes for years now. That we still find this development remarkable is a measure of how our culture has segregated “women’s issues” from politics at large.” http://qz.com/866305

http://qz.com/866305
Dec 18

Culture is a thing with a lot of mixture in it.

Culture is a thing with a lot of mixture in it.

Originally shared by Kevin Kelly

My photos of the Other Tibet. This area is culturally Tibetan in west Sichuan, China. But instead of a high dry plateau, it’s a rugged, lower terrain of fertile valleys. These pictures are from the valleys around the town of Danba. The folk here like to say, “We are Tibetan but not like the Tibetans of Tibet.” They speak Tibetan, but eat Chinese. Their homes are Tibetan but their crops are Chinese. They are in between, and their own tribe, so to speak. I was the only tourist.

https://goo.gl/photos/RmtgfcDpSsDKGrUa6

https://goo.gl/photos/RmtgfcDpSsDKGrUa6

Dec 18

I’ve been watching DC’s Legends of Tomorrow lately, and I have thoughts.

I’ve been watching DC’s Legends of Tomorrow lately, and I have thoughts.

While it doesn’t have quite the heart of The Flash or Supergirl, it’s a worthy show despite the large quantities of cheese and many plot holes. It’s an ensemble cast – something I generally enjoy, especially if it’s well done, and the writers do some things well with it.

Most notably, they avoid the tropes of That One Kickass Woman or That One Black Character. There are two kickass women, one of whom is also one of the two black characters, which fixes the tropes much more than you might think. Because when you have two of some kind of character – like two criminals, or two physicists, both of which the show also has – you can make them different from each other, and all of a sudden you don’t have a single person standing in for their whole group of people and the implication that the group is all alike – if you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all. They can be fully realised, complex characters with their own stories, who also happen to be physicists, or criminals, or black, or kickass women. That becomes one dimension of a multidimensional character. (There’s only one character who isn’t straight, though, unless Snart is asexual, which I’m starting to suspect.)

There is a terrible shortage of nerds on the show, despite a bit of Trek love at one point. Nobody has mentioned Doctor Who so far, even though there’s a British guy with a time machine; and when they went to the 1980s, nobody referenced Back to the Future, either.

Still, despite the occasionally clunky SFX, self-contradicting plot and abundant ham-and-cheese, I’m enjoying it. I’m going to watch some more right now, in fact.

Dec 17

This is something I’ve vaguely wondered about when reading about such things as aquaponics or urban farming: how do…

This is something I’ve vaguely wondered about when reading about such things as aquaponics or urban farming: how do you deal with the bulk crops, like wheat? This article puts some numbers around it: vegetables are not very calorific (they’re primarily valuable for their micronutrients, not their macronutrients), and while growing vegetables closer to the consumer is a great idea, it’s not, by itself, going to solve agriculture.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/we-need-to-feed-a-growing-planet-vegetables-arent-the-answer/2016/12/15/f0ffeb3e-c177-11e6-8422-eac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.e5fae33b217c

Dec 16

One of the things the fourth industrial revolution will change is our sense of personhood, and who or what has it.

One of the things the fourth industrial revolution will change is our sense of personhood, and who or what has it.

I mentioned in a comment to one of my other posts today that my niece refuses to talk to her boyfriend’s voice-controlled house, because that’s “weird”. Within her expected lifetime, or indeed mine, we’ll routinely be talking to all kinds of things, and seldom will it be obvious whether what answers back is a person or not.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

“One of the features of this fourth industrial revolution is that it doesn’t change what we are doing, but it changes us,” says Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.

http://suhub.co/2hDC2ch

Dec 16

I haven’t read this yet – sharing to read later – but as someone who’s grown up reading both British and American…

I haven’t read this yet – sharing to read later – but as someone who’s grown up reading both British and American books, I know the difference, and it can be painful watching an author get it wrong.

Originally shared by Joanna Penn

#writingtips Word choice differences and spelling between US and UK characters. Are you getting it right?

http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2016/12/16/british-american-characters/?utm_source=googlePlus&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialWarfare