Via Kam-Yung Soh.
No, no unicorns here.
Originally shared by Ed S
Neural nets jump to conclusions – and then defend themselves. Poorly.
More nearby. Might be worth subscribing to AIWeirdness. (If you don’t, the AI will only become more weird.)
Via Kam-Yung Soh.
No, no unicorns here.
Originally shared by Ed S
Neural nets jump to conclusions – and then defend themselves. Poorly.
More nearby. Might be worth subscribing to AIWeirdness. (If you don’t, the AI will only become more weird.)
Originally shared by Kam-Yung Soh
Deepfakes and the entertainment industry. “AUDREY HEPBURN DIED in 1993, but in 2013 she nevertheless starred in an advertisement for Galaxy, a type of chocolate bar. She was shown riding a bus along the Amalfi coast before catching the eye of a passing hunk in a convertible. In 2016 Peter Cushing, who died in 1994, reprised his role as the villainous Grand Moff Tarkin in the Star Wars film “Rogue One”. Such resurrections are not new, but they are still uncommon enough to count as news. Yet advances in special effects—and, increasingly, in artificial intelligence (AI)—are making it ever easier to manufacture convincing forgeries of human beings.
[…]
The question of who owns the rights to an actor’s digital likeness has already arisen in reality. Framestore had to negotiate with Hepburn’s family in order to make its advert. But a star’s fans often feel a sense of ownership, too. In 2013 a computer-generated version of Bruce Lee was used in an advert in China for Johnnie Walker, a brand of whisky. Johnnie Walker says it consulted with Shannon Lee, Bruce’s daughter, who approved the idea. But many fans were cross, pointing out that Lee had been teetotal for much of his adult life, and asserting that, had he still been alive, he would never have appeared in such an advertisement.
[…]
This may all be decades away, and it may never happen. Auteurs will no doubt refuse to use digital actors in their films on principle (though some might prefer them, since they will uncomplainingly follow even the most tyrannical director’s every command). But the rise of immortal digital actors is the logical outcome as today’s effects-heavy film-making techniques embrace the versatility of artificial intelligence. A trick that is currently resorted to only rarely could easily become a standard cinematic tool, like matte shots, green screens and CGI before it. Digital actors open up new possibilities in storytelling. But they also raise many new questions—and they will be able to answer them using any face, or voice, you like.”
https://www.economist.com/news/2018/07/05/what-if-ai-made-actors-immortal
The world is not only stranger than we imagine, it’s stranger than we can imagine.
Originally shared by Kam-Yung Soh
The fascinating tricks spiders use to get up, up and away. “Every day, around 40,000 thunderstorms crackle around the world, collectively turning Earth’s atmosphere into a giant electrical circuit. The upper reaches of the atmosphere have a positive charge, and the planet’s surface has a negative one. Even on sunny days with cloudless skies, the air carries a voltage of around 100 volts for every meter above the ground. In foggy or stormy conditions, that gradient might increase to tens of thousands of volts per meter.
Ballooning spiders operate within this planetary electric field. When their silk leaves their bodies, it typically picks up a negative charge. This repels the similar negative charges on the surfaces on which the spiders sit, creating enough force to lift them into the air. And spiders can increase those forces by climbing onto twigs, leaves, or blades of grass. Plants, being earthed, have the same negative charge as the ground that they grow upon, but they protrude into the positively charged air. This creates substantial electric fields between the air around them and the tips of their leaves and branches—and the spiders ballooning from those tips.
This idea—flight by electrostatic repulsion—was first proposed in the early 1800s, around the time of Darwin’s voyage. Peter Gorham, a physicist, resurrected the idea in 2013, and showed that it was mathematically plausible. And now, Morley and Robert have tested it with actual spiders.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/07/the-electric-flight-of-spiders/564437/

Within a couple of hyperbolic and relentlessly upbeat paragraphs, I knew I was reading a Peter Diamandis article. But if you dial down the hype by 80-90%, this is an interesting glimpse into medical possibilities that are on the horizon, if nowhere near ready yet.
Originally shared by Singularity Hub
Three Huge Ways Tech Is Overhauling Healthcare https://suhub.co/2tXwnFm
I see a surprising number of comma splices in some books I review.
The problem with a comma splice is that the two parts of your sentence are not connected firmly enough. You either need to separate them into two sentences; use a semicolon rather than a comma; or put a connecting word like “and” or “so” in between.
There are a couple of other ways, too, which Mignon Fogarty sets out in this article.
Originally shared by Grammar Girl
5 tools to fix a comma splice http://ow.ly/DURq30kCEbQ

Teaching a machine to debate involves breaking down how humans debate. It’s complex.
Originally shared by Singularity Hub
How Do You Win An Argument? IBM’s New AI Has a Formula https://suhub.co/2MTl1cK
Sample sentence: “Let’s ask my mom. Hey, Mom!”
When it’s standing in for a name, it gets a capital. The same is true of other titles like “captain” or “duchess”.
Originally shared by Grammar Girl
Whether you capitalize “mom” depends on how you are using the word. Is it a nickname, a common noun, or a term of endearment? http://ow.ly/8A4U30kCD7z
“How do we, collectively, allocate wealth?” is one question at the heart of this article. The others are also pretty interesting.
Originally shared by Yonatan Zunger
I’ve heard a lot of discussion about Universal Basic Income and Job Guarantees of late. Some of it seems like a good idea, but I’ve also seen some very thoughtful critiques (from both the Left and the Right) which have convinced me that neither is quite what we’re looking for.
I spent some of a lazy Sunday evening thinking about this some more, where these ideas succeed and fail, and what some of the building blocks of a better solution might look like. Here’s where I am right now — and I should warn you that far from being a perfect answer, these are preliminary thoughts, still uncertain and subject to much revision as we continue to discuss.

While it’s important not to forget about the significant challenges we still have, we’ve come a long way, and the trend is continuing in most places for most people.
Originally shared by Singularity Hub
New Evidence That the World Really Is Getting Better https://suhub.co/2yZYitd
Originally shared by Neuroscience News
The Problem with Solving Problems
When problems become rare, we count more things as problems. Our studies suggest that when the world gets better, we become harsher critics of it, and this can cause us to mistakenly conclude that it hasn’t actually gotten better at all.
The research is in Science. (full access paywall)