Early science fiction (or its predecessor, “scientific romance”) often featured a lone scientist making a breakthrough in his (always his) home laboratory. These days, we know that important science isn’t done that way; you need a big lab with lots of expensive equipment and a dozen people with PhDs in order to achieve anything, and even then it takes years.
Only… maybe that’s not always the case.
Originally shared by Singularity Hub
“[I]n the same way that anyone can now experiment with software and electronics, we should be able to experiment with plug-and-play biotechnology.”
It knows when you are sleeping. It knows when you’re awake…
Originally shared by HACKADAY
It is interesting to see the wide coverage of a police investigation looking to harvest data from the Amazon Echo, the always-listening home automation device you may know as Alexa. A murder investigation has led them to issue Amazon a warrant to fork…
This is a good summary, which isn’t just a retread of material I’ve seen before. In particular, I hadn’t previously heard that there’s a project to bring literacy to a billion people with the help of AI.
Originally shared by Singularity Hub
The AI revolution is here, and the most obvious question to ask as 2016 draws to an end is: what’s next?
Conditional optimism – that’s me. Not “everything will be fine,” but “if we work together and make good choices, there’s a decent chance that everything will be fine.”
Originally shared by David Brin
Steven Pinker – the rascal who uses facts to defeat the addicts of defeatism – points out that 2016 was not as bad as it seemed:
“War deaths have risen since 2011 because of the Syrian civil war, but are a fraction of the levels of the 1950s through the early 1990s, when megadeath wars and genocides raged all over the world. Colombia’s peace deal marks the end of the last war in the Western Hemisphere, and the last remnant of the Cold War. Homicide rates in the world are falling, and the rate in United States is lower than at any time between 1966 and 2009. Outside of war zones, terrorist deaths are far lower than they were in the heyday of the Weathermen, IRA, and Red Brigades.”
He admits that: “Several awful things happened in the world’s democracies in 2016, and the election of a mercurial and ignorant president injects a troubling degree of uncertainty into international relations. But it’s vital to keep cool and identify specific dangers rather than being overcome by a vague apocalyptic gloom.”
He adds: “More generally, the worldwide, decades-long current toward racial tolerance is too strong to be undone by one man. Public opinion polls in almost every country show steady declines in racial and religious prejudice — and more importantly for the future, that younger cohorts are less prejudiced than older ones. As my own cohort of baby boomers (who helped elect Trump) dies off and is replaced by millennials (who rejected him in droves), the world will become more tolerant.”
He reiterates a distinction: “between complacent optimism, the feeling of a child waiting for presents, and conditional optimism, the feeling of a child who wants a treehouse and realizes that if he gets some wood and nails and persuades other kids to help him, he can build one. I am not complacently optimistic about the future; I am conditionally optimistic.”
Researchers sent out resumes to a number of top law firms for prestigious positions. Everything directly career-relevant on them was identical; the only differences were in some carefully planned indicators of gender and class in the candidates’ names, interests, and extracurricular activities.
What happened next will completely fail to surprise you.
“Very real emerging technologies look certain to continue undermining media’s once static role of ‘captured’ content by transforming the familiar into a fluidly editable medium.”