May 13

If you’re writing really far-future SF, here’s a resource.

If you’re writing really far-future SF, here’s a resource.

Originally shared by Yonatan Zunger

Warning: Nerd Sniping Ahead

This is an absurdly interesting Wikipedia article: a timeline of various events in geology, biology, physics, and culture which we can expect at various points from ten thousand years in the future on forward. Almost each line of this table has a giant story behind it which could be the seed for an hour of discussion or more.

I blame Craig Sosin for this, and for the fact that I will have to consciously avoid reading this if I want to get work done today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future

May 12

I’ve shared this before, but it’s been a while, and I just had occasion to refer to it. It bears re-reading.

I’ve shared this before, but it’s been a while, and I just had occasion to refer to it. It bears re-reading.

(By one of the screenwriters for Leverage, and if you don’t know why that’s a recommendation, go immediately to Netflix and watch Leverage.)

http://io9.com/why-you-should-never-write-action-scenes-into-your-tent-511712234
May 10

Something I never got around to using in my Gryphon Clerks novels was the idea that people used different ink…

Something I never got around to using in my Gryphon Clerks novels was the idea that people used different ink colours depending on the purpose of the letter.

Originally shared by Winchell Chung

Imagine a world in which the font you use is chosen for you, based entirely on your demographic affiliations. All doctors write in Garamond, while designers are mandated Futura Bold. Middle-aged men get Arial; women, Helvetica. Goofy aunts must use Comic Sans.

Seem strange? A few centuries ago, that was just how things worked.

http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-hidden-messages-of-colonial-handwriting

May 10

“Unfortunately, the makers of technology are generally not encouraged to be introspective or reflect too deeply on…

“Unfortunately, the makers of technology are generally not encouraged to be introspective or reflect too deeply on what they are making, and this really worries me…Reading science fiction is like an ethics class for inventors, and engineers and designers should be trying to think like science fiction authors when they approach their own work… I feel with great urgency that we need to very thoughtfully consider what we build as well as encourage that same thoughtfulness out in the world.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/09/why-todays-inventors-need-to-read-more-science-fiction/279793/

May 08

The Wood Wide Web #Biohacking

Originally shared by Adafruit Industries

The Wood Wide Web #Biohacking

https://blog.adafruit.com/2016/05/08/the-wood-wide-web-biohacking/

A new study shows that trees of different species can exchange large amounts of carbon via the fungal internet that connects their roots, via The Atlantic

In 1999, a team of scientists led by Christian Körner did what thousands of people do every Christmas: they wrapped Norway spruce trees in tubes. Except this was in March, not December. And the trees were 40-metre-tall giants in the middle of a Swiss forest, not 2-metre pipsqueaks in a living room. (The team had to use a crane). And the tubes had no lights or baubles on them. Instead, they had a series of tiny holes, which pumped out carbon dioxide.

Read more

https://blog.adafruit.com/2016/05/08/the-wood-wide-web-biohacking/

May 08

Via MrsA Wiggins.

Via MrsA Wiggins.

I should note that there’s currently an SFF anthology with the theme of refugees seeking submissions, for charity, but paying pro rates. Check on The Submission Grinder – I think it’s called “Welcome”, but “refugee” is in the name as well.

Originally shared by N.R Dewi Nurmayani

http://www.dezeen.com/2015/11/23/refugee-camps-cities-of-tomorrow-killian-kleinschmidt-interview-humanitarian-aid-expert/

May 07

When Characters Argue

Originally shared by MJ Bush

When Characters Argue

Punctuate with action. Like leaving.

Don’t let it get drawn out and flimsy.

DO something.

A drawn out argument loses punch, and makes us wonder why neither is putting their foot down or compromising. It makes the positions look weak and the emotions seem insincere.

Action solidifies a position and makes us believe they mean it. Makes us believe they feel it.

Not open to negotiation? Leave.

Ready to fight? Throw a punch.

Bonus: Give them attitudes and multiple things to argue over, then let subtext reign. Even if it lasts longer, this adds substance and keeps the exchange from seeming flimsy and insincere.

#writingtips