Jan 01

Currently, natural stupidity is a much larger problem for the world than artificial intelligence.

Currently, natural stupidity is a much larger problem for the world than artificial intelligence. But when will AI reach the level that was originally envisaged at the foundation of the field, back in 1956?

It’s hard to say, because not only don’t we know how complex some of the problems are, but progress is difficult to measure.

Originally shared by Singularity Hub

When Will We Finally Achieve True Artificial Intelligence? http://suhub.co/2BTSCPq

Dec 31

In what has now become a tradition, here’s my fourth annual roundup of the best books I read this year.

In what has now become a tradition, here’s my fourth annual roundup of the best books I read this year.

I’ve added a couple of new features this time. I include “honourable mentions” for books that almost made it to the list, and a summary at the end of authors by gender on each of the four lists I’ve done so far. Results… probably won’t surprise you all that much.

Dec 31

We have met the dystopia, and it is us.

We have met the dystopia, and it is us.

Originally shared by Winchell Chung

Twitter Thread: What’s the most absurd/invasive thing that tech platforms do or have done that sounds made-up but is actually true?

For example: that time iRobot planned to sell the layouts of customers’ homes after it had been mapped by their Roomba

https://twitter.com/hypervisible/status/946822278582603777

Dec 27

I think this is unduly pessimistic.

I think this is unduly pessimistic. While there are massive problems with the Internet, and it’s hard to see how to solve them, it has brought great benefits. And I have to wonder whether the Internet created the problems or merely exposed them.

Originally shared by Winchell Chung

“I believed that the world would be a better place if everyone had a voice. I believed that the world would be a better place if we all had no secrets.

“But so far, the evidence points to an escapable conclusion: we were all wrong.”

https://shift.newco.co/my-internet-mea-culpa-f3ba77ac3eed
Dec 26

Via Brand Gamblin.

Via Brand Gamblin.

This, to me, is the most compelling argument for basic income. Just as the existence of fundamental infrastructure lets a society flourish, so does the security of its citizens and the meeting of their basic needs. This is why the agricultural and industrial revolutions accelerated innovation and improved quality of life: the majority of people no longer had to spend the majority of their time simply producing enough for their own needs, and so there was a surplus which benefited everyone.

Pull quote:

“When the business community types come out and say it will be hard to find workers (labor) because no one will want to work it’s so thinly transparent that it makes me cringe. Because what they’re saying is — “My business needs cheap labor or I may go out of business”. My response — What about creative destruction? If you can’t handle a changing system maybe your business doesn’t provide a real enough value to survive. Do we need 400 different clothing brands? Let it burn. Maybe the system is propping you up.”

Low wages subsidise unviable businesses. I’d rather see viable businesses subsidising basic income, so that more viable businesses (and other socially useful things) can rise and flourish.

Originally shared by Anne-Marie Clark

If I were omnipotent, what I would give the world for Christmas… (lots of good graphs in this short read)

Universal Basic Income: The Maslow Argument

“This should be the real argument for Universal Basic Income. Getting everyone off the bottom two rungs so they can focus on being the best human they can be. If everyone is focused on being the best version of themselves, not just on surviving, they’ll build, connect, and create.”

https://medium.com/basic-income/universal-basic-income-the-maslow-argument-d1346fa9a9f2