{"id":195,"date":"2021-01-22T09:02:23","date_gmt":"2021-01-21T20:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/?page_id=195"},"modified":"2021-01-22T09:39:50","modified_gmt":"2021-01-21T20:39:50","slug":"of-course-theres-no-comma","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/of-course-theres-no-comma\/","title":{"rendered":"Of Course There&#8217;s No Comma"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(This material is not included in the 2020 edition.)<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve recently come across a couple of authors who are doing this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><del>Of course, I am.<\/del><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>They&#8217;re putting a comma after &#8220;of course&#8221; whenever it appears. Possibly, they&#8217;re following the advice of their word processor in doing so (often a bad idea).<\/p>\n<p>As often happens, this tingled my spidey-sense that something was wrong, and then I had to figure out what the rule was, based on introspection.<\/p>\n<p>This is a rare case of grammar that operates across sentence boundaries. If the sentence that begins with &#8220;of course&#8221; is an answer to another sentence, which is (or can be rephrased as) a question about whether something is or is not the case, it doesn&#8217;t take the comma:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Are you Henrietta Wibsley?<br \/>\nOf course I am.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The rule operates not only with the &#8220;to be&#8221; verb, as in the example I just gave, but also with have, do, and the modal verbs (will\/would, can\/could, may\/might, must, shall\/should), and where the reply restates the sentence it&#8217;s responding to:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Does Henrietta know karate?<br \/>\nOf course she does.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Does Henrietta know karate?<br \/>\nOf course she knows karate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Has Henrietta been into space?<br \/>\nOf course she has.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Will Henrietta be coming?<br \/>\nOf course she will.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Can Henrietta fly a rocket?<br \/>\nOf course she can.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>May I sit here?<br \/>\nOf course you may.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Must I salute the general?<br \/>\nOf course you must.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And so on.<\/p>\n<p>The first statement doesn&#8217;t have to be phrased as a question:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Henrietta can tango.<br \/>\nOf course she can.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s an implied &#8220;can&#8217;t she?&#8221; at the end of the statement.<\/p>\n<p>The rule is actually even simpler than I&#8217;ve stated it above. In all of these cases, the answer could simply be, &#8220;Of course.&#8221; The rest of the sentence is restating or rephrasing part of the question (or original statement). If the answer could simply be given as &#8220;of course,&#8221; don&#8217;t use a comma.<\/p>\n<p>Nor does the phrase have to be &#8220;of course&#8221;; it can be any equivalent, from &#8220;indubitably&#8221; to &#8220;darn tootin'&#8221;, from &#8220;you bet&#8221; to &#8220;naturally&#8221;. I like to think of the late great Alan Rickman in <em>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix<\/em> responding with heavy sarcasm to Dolores Umbridge&#8217;s rhetorical question about his application to be Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Umbridge: But you were unsuccessful?<br \/>\nSnape: Obviously.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You could expand his answer to &#8220;Obviously I was&#8221;. There&#8217;s no comma.<\/p>\n<p>So do you ever use a comma with &#8220;of course&#8221; and its equivalents? Certainly you do.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Of course, if you&#8217;re adding new information that&#8217;s not a response to the previous sentence, you do need a comma.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>You can put the phrase at the end of the sentence that gives new information, of course.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This means, of course, that you can have two versions of the sentence punctuation that are both correct, depending on the sentence that precedes them:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Henrietta is an aardvark. Of course, I knew that.<\/p>\n<p>Did I know that Henrietta was an aardvark? Of course I knew that.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Similarly to the <a href=\"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/comma-calmer-1-commas-to-leave-out\/\">coordinate comma rule<\/a>, another test for which version applies is whether you can move &#8220;of course&#8221; to the end without it seeming weird:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Henrietta is an aardvark. I knew that, of course.<\/p>\n<p><del>Did I know that Henrietta was an aardvark? I knew that of course.\u00a0<\/del><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(Credit to Marie Brennan for pointing out that last test.)<\/p>\n<p>For fiction writing, bear in mind also that the phrase &#8220;of course&#8221; carries implications about the character who says it and their attitude. It&#8217;s often used to add authority to a pronouncement that isn&#8217;t really as certain as the speaker is making out:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Of course, we know exactly why you were there that night.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s frequently used by academics in this way. There&#8217;s a bit of unconscious arrogance (and\/or conscious bluffing) woven into the usage.<\/p>\n<p>In the non-comma version, responding to a question, it can come across as snippy, carrying the implication &#8220;you didn&#8217;t even need to ask that&#8221;, or &#8220;that&#8217;s so characteristic for you&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>May I sit here?<br \/>\nOf course you may.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>I know the answer.<br \/>\nOf course you do.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s all in the tone and the relationship, though. &#8220;Of course you may sit here&#8221; could be kind reassurance to someone lacking in confidence&#8211;but it still implies condescension, a superior talking to an inferior.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the equivalent phrases don&#8217;t necessarily carry this implication. If you ask, &#8220;Do you want pizza?&#8221; and I respond &#8220;Damn straight I do,&#8221; that&#8217;s more about being emphatic than being condescending. I&#8217;m implying &#8220;I am very hungry, and pizza is exactly what I want; thanks for suggesting it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, keep in mind the implications of this kind of back-and-forth for the relationships between your characters. But also keep in mind these simple rules:<\/p>\n<p><strong>If the sentence is a response to a previous sentence, and could be phrased as simply &#8220;of course,&#8221; don&#8217;t use a comma after &#8220;of course&#8221; (or its equivalents).\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>If the sentence provides new information that is not a restatement of the previous sentence, use a comma after &#8220;of course&#8221; at the beginning of the sentence, or before &#8220;of course&#8221; at the end of the sentence.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(This material is not included in the 2020 edition.) I&#8217;ve recently come across a couple of authors who are doing this: Of course, I am. They&#8217;re putting a comma after &#8220;of course&#8221; whenever it appears. Possibly, they&#8217;re following the advice &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/of-course-theres-no-comma\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"content-type":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/195"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/195\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":201,"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/195\/revisions\/201"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/csidemedia.com\/wellpresentedms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}