The really interesting thing here is that this is not coming from an ideological position by the company of “there…

The really interesting thing here is that this is not coming from an ideological position by the company of “there should be more of these images available”. It’s based on data mining of popular culture, social media, and what people are already searching for on their site.

Originally shared by Derrick “Quite Clever” Sanders

h/t Tonya Wershow 

http://fusion.net/story/318929/genderqueer-stock-photos-shake-cultural-stereotypes/?utm_content=buffer87dc5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

http://fusion.net/story/318929/genderqueer-stock-photos-shake-cultural-stereotypes/?utm_content=buffer87dc5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

4 thoughts on “The really interesting thing here is that this is not coming from an ideological position by the company of “there…

  1. I’ve often observed that one reason the Nazis lost is that their ideology excluded a lot of talented people who could have helped them win (and ended up, in many cases, helping their enemies instead).

    The same is true of any exclusionary approach. By depriving yourself of the intelligence, support, resources, or insights of every member of a group that you exclude, and driving them to your opposition, you weaken yourself and your cause.

  2. I’ve often observed that one reason the Nazis lost is that their ideology excluded a lot of talented people who could have helped them win (and ended up, in many cases, helping their enemies instead).

    The same is true of any exclusionary approach. By depriving yourself of the intelligence, support, resources, or insights of every member of a group that you exclude, and driving them to your opposition, you weaken yourself and your cause.

Leave a Reply to Mike Reeves-McMillan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe without commenting